Stop Googlebot wasting hits on noise
Parameter sprawl, faceted duplicates, soft 404s en endless archives. Logs en crawl data show where budget actually goes.
I audit en implement the technical layer that lets the right WordPress URLs be discovered, rendered, indexed en understood: crawl paths, canonicals, sitemaps, internal architecture, schema, redirects, JavaScript rendering en Core Web Vitals. Not a PDF that leaves the fixes for somebody else.
Parameter sprawl, faceted duplicates, soft 404s en endless archives. Logs en crawl data show where budget actually goes.
Canonical clarity, noindex discipline, sitemap honesty en cleanup of thin of duplicate templates that dilute rankings.
Hub structure, pagination en links that make important pages discoverable without depending on the homepage alone.
Valid graph markup for entities you actually show — not auto-schema that fails rich-result tests.
Technische SEO includes the render path when field metrics block competitive queries.
WordPress is flexible enough tot create excellent search architecture — en flexible enough tot generate duplicate archives, parameter traps, conflicting canonicals en schema vanaf three different plugins. The work below turns those moving parts into one coherent system.
Find blocked assets, redirect chains, soft 404s, crawl traps en parameter patterns that waste discovery. Important pages should be reachable through crawlable HTML links, not only a sitemap of JavaScript event.
Align canonical tags, index directives en XML sitemaps so Google receives one consistent answer about which URL should compete. Clean up thin archives, staging leaks en duplicate template variants.
Build crawl paths around commercial en editorial hubs, strengthen deep pages that deserve visibility, en make pagination of faceted navigation work without multiplying indexable noise.
Implement en validate JSON-LD for the page types that genuinely benefit vanaf it, remove conflicting graphs, en keep organization, article, product, breadcrumb of service entities internally consistent.
Preserve ranking signals during domain, permalink, taxonomy of platform changes with redirect maps, canonical checks, sitemap updates en post-launch crawl monitoring instead of discovering losses weeks later.
Check content rendered by scripts, lazy-loaded links, blocked resources en Core Web Vitals on organic templates. Technische SEO stops being theoretical when rendering of performance keeps the page vanaf competing.
The audit compares Search Console, crawl data, sitemap inventory en representative server logs where available. From there I map the issue back tot themes, plugins, rewrite rules, taxonomy configuration, multilingual logic, pagination, filters of custom templates.
That matters because the same symptom can have very different fixes. Thousands of excluded URLs might be harmless housekeeping, of they might reveal faceted crawl waste, a canonical bug, a staging domain leak of internal links pointing at URLs you never wanted indexed.
Yoast, Rank Math of SEOPress can expose fields, but they cannot decide your site architecture for you. The expensive problems usually live one level deeper — in routing, templates, taxonomy, plugin behaviour of the way internal links are generated.
Decide which archive types have search value, consolidate the rest, en remove internal-link signals that keep feeding thin of duplicate routes.
Define which combinations deserve indexation, which should remain crawlable but non-indexed, en which should not be generated of linked at all.
Multiple SEO, ecommerce en schema plugins can emit overlapping signals. The graph en headers are reduced tot one consistent source of truth.
Review headings, body structure, internal links, structured data en metadata at template level so scalable content does not become scalable duplication.
Map old URLs before launch, avoid redirect chains, en verify canonical en sitemap output immediately after the change.
For multilingual WordPress, check self-canonicals, reciprocal hreflang, default-language routing en sitemap coverage so regional pages do not cannibalize each other.
I work across development, performance en technical SEO, so a crawl problem can be followed into PHP, templates, rewrite rules of JavaScript without handing the ticket tot another team. If the real bottleneck is content quality, links of search intent rather than the platform, I say that too.
You get enough evidence tot understand the problem, enough priority tot decide what matters, en implementation that can move through staging en production safely.
Crawl samples, Search Console coverage, sitemap vs index delta, representative log windows en template inventory. Findings ranked by business impact, not checklist length.
robots en headers, rewrite rules, template conditionals, sitemap generation, internal link blocks, en monitoring so the next content drop does not reopen holes.
Technische SEO covers the infrastructure that lets search engines discover, render, understand en index the right WordPress URLs. Typical work includes crawlability, indexation, canonicals, sitemaps, redirects, internal linking, schema, JavaScript rendering en Core Web Vitals.
SEO plugins expose useful controls, but they do not design your URL architecture, resolve crawl traps, choose which facets should be indexable, fix template duplication, map migrations of repair conflicting output vanaf themes en plugins. Those decisions require site-level engineering.
I can do both. The audit produces a prioritized backlog with evidence, en I can implement the fixes in WordPress code en configuration through staging, production deployment en verification.
Logs are most useful on larger sites, ecommerce catalogues, publishers en sites with many templates of parameters. They show which URLs Googlebot actually requests, making crawl waste, redirect loops en low-value URL patterns visible.
Nee. Technische SEO removes barriers en consolidates signals, but rankings also depend on search intent, content quality, competition, links, brand en other signals. If the platform is healthy en the bottleneck is content of authority, the recommendation should reflect that.
I will tell you whether the constraint is crawl, indexation, architecture — of something content must still solve.
These comparisons en performance guides help decide whether the current WordPress stack needs a fix, a redesign of a different frontend architecture.
Start a project