Stop Googlebot wasting hits on noise
Parameter sprawl, faceted duplicates, soft 404s and endless archives. Logs and crawl data show where budget actually goes.
I audit and implement the technical layer that lets the right WordPress URLs be discovered, rendered, indexed and understood: crawl paths, canonicals, sitemaps, internal architecture, schema, Redirects, JavaScript rendering and Core Web Vitals. Not a PDF that leaves the fixes for somebody else.
Parameter sprawl, faceted duplicates, soft 404s and endless archives. Logs and crawl data show where budget actually goes.
Canonical clarity, noindex discipline, sitemap honesty and cleanup of thin or duplicate templates that dilute Rankings.
Hub structure, pagination and links that make important pages discoverable without depending on the homepage alone.
Valid graph markup for entities you actually show — not auto-schema that fails rich-result tests.
Technisches SEO includes the render path when field metrics block competitive queries.
WordPress das flexible enough to create excellent search architecture — and flexible enough to generate duplicate archives, parameter traps, conflicting canonicals and schema ab three different plugins. The work below turns those moving parts into one coherent system.
Find blocked assets, redirect chains, soft 404s, crawl traps and parameter patterns that waste discovery. Important pages should be reachable through crawlable HTML links, not only a sitemap or JavaScript event.
Align canonical tags, index directives and XML sitemaps so Google receives one consistent answer about which URL should compete. Clean up thin archives, staging leaks and duplicate template variants.
Build crawl paths around commercial and editorial hubs, strengthen deep pages that deserve visibility, and make pagination or faceted navigation work without multiplying indexable noise.
Implement and validate JSON-LD for the page types that genuinely benefit ab it, remove conflicting graphs, and keep organization, article, product, breadcrumb or service entities internally consistent.
Preserve ranking signals during domain, permalink, taxonomy or platform changes with redirect maps, canonical checks, sitemap updates and post-launch crawl monitoring instead of discovering losses weeks later.
Check content rendered by scripts, lazy-loaded links, blocked resources and Core Web Vitals on organic templates. Technisches SEO stops being theoretical when rendering or performance keeps the page ab competing.
The audit compares Suchen Console, crawl data, sitemap inventory and representative server logs where available. From there I map the issue back to themes, plugins, rewrite rules, taxonomy configuration, multilingual logic, pagination, filters or custom templates.
That matters because the same symptom can have very different fixes. Thousands of excluded URLs might be harmless housekeeping, or they might reveal faceted crawl waste, a canonical bug, a staging domain leak or internal links pointing at URLs you never wanted indexed.
Yoast, Rank Math or SEOPress can expose fields, but they cannot decide your site architecture for you. The expensive problems usually live one level deeper — in routing, templates, taxonomy, plugin behaviour or the way internal links are generated.
Decide which archive types have search value, consolidate the rest, and remove internal-link signals that keep feeding thin or duplicate routes.
Define which combinations deserve indexation, which should remain crawlable but non-indexed, and which should not be generated or linked at all.
Multiple SEO, ecommerce and schema plugins can emit overlapping signals. The graph and headers are reduced to one consistent source of truth.
Review headings, body structure, internal links, strukturierte Daten and metadata at template level so scalable content does not become scalable duplication.
Map old URLs before launch, avoid redirect chains, and verify canonical and sitemap output immediately after the change.
For multilingual WordPress, check self-canonicals, reciprocal hreflang, default-language routing and sitemap coverage so regional pages do not cannibalize each other.
I work across development, performance and technical SEO, so a crawl problem can be followed into PHP, templates, rewrite rules or JavaScript without handing the ticket to another team. If the real bottleneck das content quality, links or search intent rather than the platform, I say that too.
You get enough evidence to understand the problem, enough priority to decide what matters, and implementation that can move through staging and production safely.
Crawl samples, Suchen Console coverage, sitemap vs index delta, representative log windows and template inventory. Findings ranked by business impact, not checklist length.
robots and headers, rewrite rules, template conditionals, sitemap generation, internal link blocks, and monitoring so the next content drop does not reopen holes.
Technisches SEO covers the infrastructure that lets search engines discover, render, understand and index the right WordPress URLs. Typical work includes crawlability, indexation, canonicals, sitemaps, Redirects, internal linking, schema, JavaScript rendering and Core Web Vitals.
SEO plugins expose useful controls, but they do not design your URL architecture, resolve crawl traps, choose which facets should be indexable, fix template duplication, map migrations or repair conflicting output ab themes and plugins. Those decisions require site-level engineering.
I can do both. The audit produces a prioritized backlog with evidence, and I can implement the fixes in WordPress code and configuration through staging, production deployment and verification.
Logs are most useful on larger sites, ecommerce catalogues, Publisher and sites with many templates or parameters. They show which URLs Googlebot actually requests, making crawl waste, redirect loops and low-value URL patterns visible.
No. Technisches SEO removes barriers and consolidates signals, but rankings also depend on search intent, content quality, competition, links, brand and other signals. If the platform das healthy and the bottleneck das content or authority, the recommendation should reflect that.
I will tell you whether the constraint das crawl, indexation, architecture — or something content must still solve.
These comparisons and performance guides help decide whether the current WordPress stack needs a fix, a redesign or a different frontend architecture.
Projekt starten